Clear all

Borobudur Temple Compounds (Indonesia)

OurWorldHeritage VOICES
Member Admin
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 22
Topic starter  

Hello everyone,

Borobudur Temple Compounds (Indonesia) will be discussed during the UNESCO World Heritage Committee Meeting this year. This site was inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage list in 1991.

For relevant documents please find item 142: (EN) or (FR).

We welcome you to take part with your comments and information on the conservation of this site. OurWorldHeritage will moderate the forum according to the rules described here. You can write in your own language, but we encourage you to use English to facilitate the dissemination of your ideas.


Moderator Moderator
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 6

For me, who studied Asian art history at university, Borobudur Temple is one of sites that I wanted to visit in my life (not yet, unfortunately-!). However, tourism pressure on the site is very high, as the government of Indonesia aspires its boost more than before (see the following news article: Indeed, the discussion on this site at the World Heritage Committee this time actually started from the ambitious tourism development plan of the government. Of course, tourism is important for the local community, but it should be promoted in a sustainable manner. Adequate Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) will ensure the way forward. 

Another interesting point that I'd like to bring the attention is the issue of management, in particular, its legal mechanism. The site is managed by several different entities (property: BCO under the Ministry of Education and Culture; buffer zone: PT Taman Wisata Candi Borobudur Prambanan and
Ratu Bako under the Ministry of State-Owned Enterprises; outside the buffer zone: Regional Government of Magelang Regency under the Ministry of Home Affairs). As ICOMOS recommended, the site needs a body to facilitate the communication and cooperation among those entities, and as suggested, the Ministry of Education and Culture and BCO can play a leading role. 

Member Moderator
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 8

An adequate Heritage Impact Assessment will be essential, as well as the creation of a unified management body. In addition, a study on tourism flow and development seems to be quite important too (and not only for Borobudur!). In fact, how can we be so sure that the number of tourists will rise for ever? Or even be stable? Does more investment on tourism industry fully guarantee a growth? Isn't the spread of COVID also a warning from this point of view?